World Federation of
Science Journalists

Science Journalists mobilized to fight CNN decision

December 22, 2008 posted in Sci.Journalism 1 comment >>


December 19, 2008

Jim Walton, President
CNN Worldwide
One CNN Center, 6 South Tower
Atlanta, GA 30303

Jon Klein, President
CNN/US
One Time Warner Center
New York, NY 10019

Dear Mr. Walton and Mr. Klein,

We are writing on behalf of several national and international science journalism organizations to express our strong concern about CNN's shortsighted decision to cut its science, technology and environment unit in one fell swoop. In wielding this ax, your network has lost an experienced and highly regarded group of science journalists at a time when science coverage could not be more important in our national and international discourse.

The environment, energy technology, space exploration, and biotechnology are crucial ongoing stories that will have growing prominence as a new American president takes office and nations confront a wide range of science-based global issues. As the impacts of climate change intensify, shows like "Planet in Peril" cannot make up for informed daily coverage of this important issue and other science topics in the public eye. As with political and policy reporting, it is important that the underlying science be covered by journalists with the skills and knowledge to sort out competing claims.

Concerned as we are about the dismissal of our colleagues—including the award-winning science reporter Miles O'Brien in New York; Peter Dykstra, head of CNN's science unit in Atlanta; and five other science producers there—this letter is not about individual journalists. Rather, the wholesale dismantling of the science unit calls into question CNN's commitment to bringing the most informative science news to the general public, including the science-minded younger audience. If CNN wants to be truly international, it will be at odds with the trend toward increased science coverage in many parts of the world.

It is difficult for us to imagine why CNN, which has earned a justifiably strong reputation for its science journalism in the past, has opted to widen the gap in science coverage rather than strive to fill it. We would hope that you would reconsider your decision and reassemble a cadre of well-trained science journalists that would enable you to expand unfolding science news and in-depth coverage, not shrink it.

Your action is an unfortunate symbol of recent widespread cutbacks in specialty science journalism. Our groups will continue to push for more science coverage by the major media and to do our part to promote the highest possible professional standards for communicating complex science-based issues across the spectrum. We plan to publicize this letter as widely as possible to encourage further discussion of the future of science journalism. Thanks for your attention.

Sincerely,

Cristine Russell, President, Council for the Advancement of Science Writing (CASW)
russellcris@nasw.org

Mariette DiChristina, President, National Association of the Science Writers (NASW)
mdichristina@sciam.com

Christy George, President, Society of Environmental Journalists (SEJ)
CGeorge@opb.org

Pallab Ghosh, President, World Federation of Science Journalists (WFSJ)
pallab.ghosh@bbc.co.uk


BACKGROUND:

The Council for the Advancement of Science Writing (www.casw.org) is a non-profit group committed to improving the quality of science news reaching the public by helping reporters and writers produce accurate and informative stories about science, technology, medicine and the environment.

The National Association of Science Writers (
www.nasw.org) is a professional society of about 2,500 American science journalists, including freelancers and staff of newspapers, wire services, magazines, broadcast outlets, multimedia, and science communication offices, as well as science journalism students.

The Society of Environmental Journalists (
www.sej.org), with about 1,500 members, is a U.S.- based group of working journalists, academics and students committed to advancing public understanding of environmental issues.

The World Federation of Science Journalists (
www.wfsj.org), an international organization representing 37 associations of science and technology journalists from Africa, the Americas, the Asia-Pacific, Europe and the Middle East, seeks to improve the quality of science reporting worldwide.


A SAMPLING OF COMMENTARY:

pfd version




Comments
Disgusted by CNN's decision
posted on December 26, 2008 by  Charles Ogallo
As members of the African Journalism fraternity who have respective and adored CNN's fear-less stand in giving audience first and real news, We feel disappointed by the dictatorial decision to disband science in its coverage.

CNN needs to understand that this decision will be impacting negatively to the lives of African populations, who feel they have been denied their universal right; Freedom of expression on matters to do with universal environment and Science.

Africa only knows that the good or positive news CNN can give about the Continent is on Environment and Science developments. When it comes to politics, all that they see is war, diseases and emancipated bodies of dying Africans from hunger and diseases. All have been painted dark; moreover they call it the Dark Continent.

We love CNN when it comes to environmental and science news coverage especially on the impact of global climate change, rich and unique natural resources and culture of Africa. Therefore for CNN to decide to put this behind it and focus on politics, I think Africa is in real trouble. At a time when the man they feel to be their own -President Elect Barack Obama, is taking over the top leadership of the powerful nation in the world.

This was the right time for CNN which they have trusted to give them the right and more information on environment and science rather than politics.

The CNN decision comes at a time when the world needs more scientific and environmental news especially on effects of global warming to their health, about new developments in the world of science especially researches on HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Cancer that is hitting Africa harder. If CNN decides to put all this under the carpet, it’s really in bad faith.

However, on behalf of Kenya Online Journalists Association -KOJA, and African media fraternity in general, we disregard the CNN stand, and join the World Federation of Science Journalists in calling on the CNN management to immediately rescind the decision. We also appeal to the US President Elect Barack Obama to intervene over the decision if he truly believes that US is sincerely out to promote a clean global environment and scientific developments for better and healthy lives.

Read more on www.kojanews.blogspot.com.

Commenting is close